New York State Police definition for the phrase "organized crime"

Don Stone filed this request with the New York State Police of New York.
Tracking #

STONE_NYSP_20230605032657356

Est. Completion None
Status
No Responsive Documents

From: Don Stone

To Whom It May Concern:

Pursuant to the New York Freedom of Information Law, I hereby request the following records:

1. New York State Police a copy of the definition for the phrase "organized crime syndicate "
2. New York State Police a copy of the definition for the phrase "white collar organized crime syndicate "
3. A copy of the New York State Police policy or protocol for vetting individuals that have alleged ties to organized crime syndicates for high level employment by the
State of New York.
4. A copy of the New York State Police policy or protocol for vetting individuals that have alleged ties to white collar organized crime syndicates for high level
employment by the State of New York.
5. A copy of the New York State Police policy or protocol for vetting individuals involved in alleged "Fraud on the Court" schemes". (See attached fraud on the court def.)

The basic standards governing fraud on the court are reasonably straightforward. As set forth in Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998):

The requisite fraud on the court occurs where “it can be demonstrated, clearly and convincingly, that a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.” Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989). . . . The trial court has the inherent authority, within the exercise of sound judicial discretion, to dismiss an action when a plaintiff has perpetrated a fraud on the court, or where a party refuses to comply with court orders. Kornblum v. Schneider, 609 So. 2d 138, 139 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

The requested documents will be made available to the general public, and this request is not being made for commercial purposes.

In the event that there are fees, I would be grateful if you would inform me of the total charges in advance of fulfilling my request. I would prefer the request filled electronically, by e-mail attachment if available or CD-ROM if not.

Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. I look forward to receiving your response to this request within 5 business days, as the statute requires.

Sincerely,

Don Stone

From: New York State Police

Email






Thank you for submitting your FOIL request through Open FOIL NY.

Here is your Open FOIL NY confirmation information for future reference:

STONE_NYSP_20230605032657356

INFORMATION SUBMITTED:

Records Requested From
New York State Police


Short Title
New York State Police definition for the phrase "organized crime"

Description
To Whom It May Concern:Pursuant to the New York Freedom of Information Law, I hereby request the following records:1. New York State Police a copy of the definition for the phrase "organized crime syndicate "2. New York State Police a copy of the definition for the phrase "white collar organized crime syndicate "3. A copy of the New York State Police policy or protocol for vetting individuals that have alleged ties to organized crime syndicates for high level employment by theState of New York.4. A copy of the New York State Police policy or protocol for vetting individuals that have alleged ties to white collar organized crime syndicates for high levelemployment by the State of New York.5. A copy of the New York State Police policy or protocol for vetting individuals involved in alleged "Fraud on the Court" schemes". (See attached fraud on the court def.)The basic standards governing fraud on the court are reasonably straightforward. As set forth in Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998):The requisite fraud on the court occurs where “it can be demonstrated, clearly and convincingly, that a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.” Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989). . . . The trial court has the inherent authority, within the exercise of sound judicial discretion, to dismiss an action when a plaintiff has perpetrated a fraud on the court, or where a party refuses to comply with court orders. Kornblum v. Schneider, 609 So. 2d 138, 139 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).The requested documents will be made available to the general public, and this request is not being made for commercial purposes.In the event that there are fees, I would be grateful if you would inform me of the total charges in advance of fulfilling my request. I would prefer the request filled electronically, by e-mail attachment if available or CD-ROM if not.Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. I look forward to receiving your response to this request within 5 business days, as the statute requires.Sincerely,Don StoneUpload documents directly: https://www.muckrock.com/

Uploaded Files


FOIL Response Format
Email

If fees apply, please contact me if costs will be greater than
$25
Your FOIL request has been forwarded to the organization(s) you selected, and the respective Records Access Officer will contact you directly for further processing of your request. Please allow up to five business days for such communication(s). For your convenience, here is additional contact information:

New York State Police
1220 Washington Avenue
Bldg 22
Albany, NY 12226-2252

From: New York State Police

June 5, 2023

Don Stone
MuckRock News, DEPT MR147047
263 Huntington Avenue
Boston, Massachusetts 02115
Re: FOIL Number NYSP-23-06-309
Dear Don Stone:
This will acknowledge receipt of your request for records under the Freedom of Information Law received by New York State Police on June 5, 2023. The request was for "New York State Police definition for the phrase "organized crime".
Your request has been forwarded to the appropriate program area(s) to identify documents that are responsive to your request and which may be made available pursuant to all applicable provisions of the Freedom of Information Law.
A determination as to whether your request is granted or denied will be reached by or before August 9, 2023.
Please note that, pursuant to Article 6 of the Public Officers Law, a charge may be applied to your request, including the actual cost of the medium used to respond to your Freedom of Information Law request and/or other related costs. When responsive records have been identified, you will be informed of any cost and how payment should be made.
PLEASE NOTE: **
As we have acknowledged your request, please refrain from submitting duplicate requests for the same records through Open FOIL. Submitting a duplicate request takes time away from processing the hundreds of requests received each month. If you have additional information to add to your request, or you would like to know the status of your request, please contact the FOIL Unit via email or call us at (518) 464-7100, option #2.

Sincerely,
[cid:image001.jpg@01D99786.9FF118D0]
Staff Inspector William H. Gorman
Records Access Officer
Central Records Bureau

________________________________

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail, including any attachments, may contain highly sensitive and confidential information. It is intended only for the individual(s) named. If you received this e-mail in error or from someone who was not authorized to send it to you, do not disseminate, copy or otherwise use this e-mail or its attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete the e-mail from your system.

From: New York State Police

Please see the attached correspondence pertaining to your request for copies of records from the New York State Police.