DEA seized Bitcoin policies
Tracking # |
15-00420-F |
Submitted | April 2, 2015 |
MuckRock users can file, duplicate, track, and share public records requests like this one. Learn more.
Communications
From: William Green
To Whom It May Concern:
This is a request under the Freedom of Information Act. I hereby request the following records:
All documents relating to DEA policy regarding the handling, monitoring, safeguarding, and auditing of digital currency, including but not limited to Bitcoin, Dogecoin, and Namecoin, seized by the DEA during criminal investigations.
The requested documents will be made available to the general public free of charge as part of the public information service at MuckRock.com, and is not being made for commercial usage.
In the event that fees cannot be waived, I would be grateful if you would inform me of the total charges in advance of fulfilling my request. I would prefer the request filled electronically, by e-mail attachment if available or CD-ROM if not.
Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. I look forward to receiving your response to this request within 20 business days, as the statute requires.
Sincerely,
William Green
From: Drug Enforcement Administration
An acknowledgement letter, stating the request is being processed.
From: MuckRock.com
To Whom It May Concern:
I wanted to follow up on the following Freedom of Information request, copied below, and originally submitted on April 2, 2015. Please let me know when I can expect to receive a response, or if further clarification is needed. You had assigned it reference number #15-00420-F.
Thank you for your help.
From: MuckRock.com
To Whom It May Concern:
I wanted to follow up on the following Freedom of Information request, copied below, and originally submitted on April 2, 2015. Please let me know when I can expect to receive a response, or if further clarification is needed. You had assigned it reference number #15-00420-F.
Thank you for your help.
From: Drug Enforcement Administration
The request has been rejected as being too vague, burdensome or otherwise unprocessable.